As we approach the end of year, it's time to take stock of 2009 and pause long enough in our holiday preparations to look forward to 2010. While none of us can predict the future--my snow globe doesn't double as a crystal ball--there are three organizations that have made projections of oil demand in the coming year.
- The Energy Information Administration (EIA), a division of the U.S. Department of Energy, projects that oil demand will rise by 1.1 million barrels a day in 2010.
- The Organization of Oil Exporting Countries (OPEC) similarly predicts that demand will increase 0.8 million barrels a day.
- The International Energy Agency (IEA) has stated that world oil demand will rise by 1.5 million barrels a day to a total of 86.3 million barrels a day.
These forecasts paint a hopeful prognosis for the economy, but also they foreshadow a potential problem for the United States. Rising oil demand could strain the worldwide existing capacity to produce oil, and that could put upward pressure on price. So, what has the United States done to prepare for such an eventuality?
Nothing.
The best way to meet this challenge is to produce more domestic oil and natural gas. Instead, this administration has embarked on a pattern of delay which has prevented several scheduled energy developments to move forward.
- In February, Interior Secretary Salazar extended the comment period on the 2010-2015 five-year offshore leasing plan by six months and has not taken any additional action.
- Likewise, the administration has failed to make progress on Lease Sale 220 in offshore Virginia scheduled for 2011. It's estimated that the Sale 220 area could contain 1.14 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 130 million barrels of oil.
- Sec. Salazar cancelled oil and natural gas leases on 77 parcels of federal lands in Utah, then announced that 60 of them would be removed from development--eight permanently and 52 indefinitely.
- The administration's fiscal 2010 budget contains at least $80 billion in tax increases on the U.S. oil and natural gas industry. These increases will depress investment in new domestic oil and natural gas projects, weakening the nation's energy security and doing nothing to defray the impact of higher world oil energy prices on America.
Delays and actions that discourage domestic oil and natural gas production are not the answer. It's time to encourage domestic oil and natural gas production to benefit all Americans by raising supply levels, creating well-paying jobs, and improving the nation's energy security.








Jane and jack, I agree. We all agree.. So lead...You guys got the cash so do a progressive commercial/ad that grabs voter's attention and intelligence. Those rallies are only so good.
Do something outragious... Then put it in the NY Times like other orgs do. Why is this so difficult???
Do something.....different and lets see what happens...
Joe vecchio
Yes indeed, Open ANWR for a start. Shell spends 2.3 billion on Chuck-chi lease sales 120 miles off shore and 400 miles to the west of the nearest infrastructure on moving ice. Meanwhile 15 miles from the Badami oil field pipeline leading to Prudhoe Bay is the 10-02 of ANWR containing over 5 billion barrels of oil. Nothing to do with Shell other than they ignore on shore work. Everything to do with Congress that doesn't understand oil is practically "free" money to them and could pay for more wind turbines and solar panels than you could shake a stick at. Makes no sense economically, logistically, or statistically. Makes no sense politically either except for the pig headed backwards thinking avatars called Pelosi, Cantwell, Boxer, Reid, Markey and Lieberman....oh and McCain who still thinks the Grand Canyon is in Alaska???
Sigh what a ridiculous lot